My somewhat circuitous route home (all times local)
December 21, 2007 at 1:35 am | In Uncategorized | 3 CommentsThurs Dec 20 9:52pm – 10:00pm: A number 3 bus to the Tucson Greyhound Station.
Thurs Dec 20 10:50pm – 08:45am: A 1419 Greyhound to LA.
After that: A 2 mile taxiride to Union Station.
Some small amount of time after that: A 40 minute Flyaway bus ride to LAX.
Fri Dec 21 1:50pm – Sat Dec 22 8:10pm: China Air flight CI0005 to Taipei.
Sat Dec 22 9:45pm – Sun Dec 23 08:20am: China Air flight CI0053 to Brisbane.
Some small to medium amount of time after that: Skytrain to Brisbane City.
Mon Dec 24: Train to Robina? Or bus to Alstonville/Ballina?
It’s my own fault really. I booked these flights ages ago with the cheapest airline I could find and they didn’t fly direct to Tucson.
The F Team
December 20, 2007 at 5:49 pm | In Alphabet teams, Cricket | 4 CommentsRoy Fredericks (59 tests, 4334 runs @ 42.49)
Jack Fingleton (18 tests 1189 @ 42.46)
Stephen Fleming (c) (106 tests, 6774 runs @ 39.61)
CB Fry (26 tests, 1223 runs @ 32.18)
‘Tip’ Foster (8 tests, 602 runs @ 46.30)
Andy Flower (wk) (63 tests, 4794 runs @ 51.54, 160 dismissals)
Aubrey Faulkner (25 tests, 1754 runs @ 40.79, 82 wickets @ 26.58)
Andrew Flintoff (67 tests, 3381 runs @ 32.50, 197 wickets @ 32.02)
Frank Foster (11 tests, 330 runs @ 23.57, 45 wickets @ 20.57)
Damien Fleming (20 tests, 305 runs @ 19.06, 75 wickets @ 25.89)
Fazal Mahmood (34 tests, 620 runs @ 14.09, 139 wickets @ 24.70)
Notes:
- Other players to consider include Keith Fletcher, Kenneth Farnes, Dilhara Fernando, James Franklin, Chuck Fleetwood Smith, Alfred Freeman, Angus Fraser.
- Alan Fairfax was unlucky to miss out. He played 10 tests and had a batting average of 51.25 and a bowling average of 30.71. But he couldn’t squeeze out Faulkner, Flintoff and Foster as the all rounders.
- Faulkner was part of the famous South African googly battery. Foster bowled with SF Barnes before his career was cut short by a motorcycle accident in WWI.
- CB Fry’s numbers aren’t that impressive but he could jump backwards from a standing position onto a mantelpiece so that’s gotta be worth something.
- Fleming fights off the captaincy challenge from the aristocratic Englishmen. They might not like it but Fleming’s captaincy against Australia has been occasionally masterful even if the plaudits he gets from commentators are not always deserved.
- I like this team a lot. A very deep batting lineup and good varied bowling.
The E team
December 20, 2007 at 4:58 pm | In Alphabet teams, Cricket | 1 CommentMatthew Elliott (21 tests, 1172 runs @ 33.48)
John Edrich (c) (77 tests, 5138 runs @ 43.54)
Russell Endean (28 tests, 1630 runs @ 33.95)
Bill Edrich (39 tests, 954 runs @ 42.39)
Ross Edwards (20 tests, 11171 runs @ 40.37)
Sean Ervine (5 tests, 261 runs @ 32.62, 9 wickets @ 43.11)
John Emburey (64 tests, 1713 runs @ 22.53, 147 wickets @ 38.40)
Godfrey Evans (wk) (91 tests, 2439 runs @ 20.49 bat, 219 dismissals)
Phil Edmonds (51 tests, 875 runs @ 17.50, 125 wickets @ 34.18)
Richard Ellison (11 tests, 202 runs @ 13.46, 35 wickets @ 29.94)
Fidel Edwards (27 tests, 136 runs @ 4.12, 72 wickets @ 43.01)
Notes:
- This one was hard to put together. Unusually there are large numbers of opening batsman, finger spinners and wicketkeepers with names starting with ‘E’. There aren’t many fast bowlers or middle order batsman.
- Other players to consider: Farokh Engineer, Bruce Edgar.
- The batting is quite deep though lacking a little quality at the top. The pace bowling is probably going to let the side down and I’m never very excited about English finger spinners.
Review of the semester
December 19, 2007 at 3:40 pm | In Uni | 1 CommentSo I got my marks back today and got 3 As and a K (for kontinuing).
What have I learnt?
MATH511A Algebra – We did linear algebra and group theory this semester. Linear algebra was as boring as always but I feel a little more confident about stuff like spectral theory. Group theory started off as review but quickly moved into stuff that I didn’t know or wasn’t all that sharp at. Group actions, semidirect products and Sylow’s theorems were very nice and led to stuff like the classification of groups of order seen in the exam below.
The lecturer was good with a couple of caveats. He loves abstraction, for example introducing free groups by their universal property and barely even mentioning that you can think of them as groups generated by things with no relations. That’s nice for people who already have some intuitive notion of what a free group is but if you haven’t though about them before it would be confusing. He also had some timing issues. The linear algebra was all at a slow-medium kind of pace and by the end he went crazy covering what he wanted to – there was a crash course on nilpotent and solvable groups in 50 minutes for the final lecture.
Next semester I think we will do Jordan Canonical form, commutative modules and Galois theory.
MATH523A Real Analysis – This was set theory and measure theory. I knew all of the set theory except for the proof of Banach-Tarski which was very interesting. Measure theory so far is definitely at a higher level than Harold Bevan Thompson’s course. The exercises out of the book are really hard and we’re doing everything at slightly higher levels of abstraction. I feel like I understand how the theory fits together but am going to have to do some work to be able to answer questions under time pressure.
The lecturer is Russian and quite good. However it is just an endless march of epsilons across the board – very technical analysis.
Next semester differentiation (Raydon-Nikodym), spaces, some functional analysis.
MATH534A Topology/Geometry – I had never done any of this stuff before. We studied smooth manifolds and differential geometry on them. It’s kind of an awful subject – there’s about six weeks of definitions before you get anywhere and just showing something is a smooth manifold can take about three pages of work. We’ve been expected to learn most of the material just by reading the text, class time is just for examples and time wasting. So I have some vague idea about smooth manifolds, tangent bundles, cotangent bundles, tensors, differential forms, orientations, integral curves and flows, Lie derivatives, Lie groups,… but I’m not particularly confident about any of it.
The lecturer for this is a nice old bloke who is something of a paradox. He is a bumbling fool at the blackboard, sometimes spending 10 minutes just gesturing and mumbling. However he can write beautiful explanations in handouts and very interesting homework problems.
Next semester we need to clean up a few things so we can state and prove Stokes theorem in full generality. Then DeRham cohomology and onto algebraic topology.
MATH597T Professional Development Workshop in Teaching Mathematics (This is what the K is in. It’s a 1 credit course spread across 2 semesters) – Pretty much a waste of time.
Pima Air and Space museum
December 19, 2007 at 3:06 pm | In Life in America, photos | Leave a CommentSo I had a couple of days before my flight home for Christmas and decide I should probably do some tourism. I decided that the Pima Air and Space museum looked interesting.
Their website says that there is no access by bus but I decided to ignore that and get there by bus. So I got a 6 to the Laos transit centre and then a 26 to Littletown rd (which was pretty much a bus tour through the slums of South Tucson). There I was dumped on the side of a road about 2 km away from the museum. But I could see planes in the distance. So I set off across the desert. After crossing a dry river bed and the train tracks and with some fear of being shot by military police or bombed in a training exercise (the museum is right next to the Davis-Monthan Airforce Base) I got there. It was a beautiful winter day, about 23ºC with not a cloud in the sky. That walk could have been fatal in the summer but was pretty comfortable yesterday.
The museum was pretty good. The interactive stuff was pretty ordinary but there were a lot of very nice planes. I got a couple of photos:
The front
and back of an SR-71 Blackbird. This plane flies at over Mach 3 and is the fastest manned jet plane ever. I was amazed at how long it was – most of the photos you see of it are from front on.
A B-29 bomber that flew 26 bombing missions agains Japan in WWII.
A NASA Super Guppy used for transporting shuttle parts.
Some helicopters.
The best email I’ve ever received
December 17, 2007 at 4:53 am | In Life in America, Teaching | Leave a CommentCan i just get a C cut a brother some slack. signed, D student.
Ugh
December 14, 2007 at 5:19 pm | In Mathematics, Uni | 5 CommentsAnalysis exam was fairly brutal. I’ll be lucky to get 50%. Who knows what that will translate to as a grade.
A question for anyone playing along at home: Find the following limit
.
Give complete justification for your answer.
Edit: In a stunning display of speed grading by Friedlander the analysis grades are on student link. I got an A.
Chappell-Hadlee trophy
December 14, 2007 at 4:30 am | In Cricket | 1 CommentSo we come to the unwanted stepchild of the cricketing calendar.
I quite like New Zealand so I’ll be rooting for them (as they say in my current country of residence). I feared that they would struggle against the pace but McCullum is going fine at the moment. With Styris, Oram and a few others to come they’ve got a chance to get a good score here.
Uncle J Rod is providing some ‘live’ commentary which should be interesting.
If I type something in TeX it may as well go on the internet
December 14, 2007 at 1:23 am | In Mathematics, Uni | Leave a CommentSo I’ve finished up my two take home exams. Analysis is a 2hr exam tomorrow.
Algebra: Questions on symplectic forms, Not Burnside’s Lemma, classifying groups of order and Burnside’s basis theorem.
I got one of the Burnside’s lemma questions wrong – miscounting the symmetries of the cube (amusingly the answer is on the wikipedia page – at least that proves that I followed the rules and didn’t use any outside sources). The rest of it is pretty close to correct I think, although I’m sure there are shorter ways to do question 3.
Geometry (missing pictures): questions on visualising mobius bands and Klein bottles, showing that the set of all lines in is a smooth manifold homeomorphic to the infinite Mobius band, stuff with vector fields, wedge products, alternating tensors, vector fields on
considered as a submanifold in
, and proving that the tangent bundle to a manifold is an orientable manifold.
I think I got most of these right but as usual in this course sometimes I was just taking partial derivatives for no reason so someone who knew what they were doing would surely have some corrections. Questions 2,3,6 probably have some errors.
I didn’t ruin too many student’s lives. Hooray.
December 12, 2007 at 11:51 pm | In Teaching | Leave a CommentMy section’s average on the final 69.5%.
Average for all sections 67.9%.
Overall average for my class 76.5%.
Grades: 4 A’s, 12 B’s, 10 C’s, 4 D’s, 2 E’s, 1W, 1 drop before the drop deadline.
The grading system for this course is absurdly decentralised and makes essentially no use of the fact that there is a common final. The instructor (me) writes four tests worth 100 point each and has homework (I had 23 homework assignments and 5 quizzes) worth 150 points. Then the common final is worth 200 points.
If a student gets 90% they are guaranteed an A, 80 is a B, 70 is a C, 60 is a D. After the course meeting today these numbers were dropped (for no real reason) to 88, 79, 69, 59. But the spread of final exam percentages (there are over thirty sections and I remember the numbers going from the high fifties to the low eighties) and the difference between peoples class averages and exam averages (from -10 to +15 approx.) is huge.
If your class had a lower average on in class work than on the final then you were allowed to move some people’s grades up. But if I had had a class average of 70 instead of 76 then it would have just been bad luck for my students.
So the lesson for the future is to scare my students with some hard tests at the beginning and then try to give them some cheap points at the end of semester. That’s what I did this time accidentally and it’s worked out pretty well.
Of course my last paragraph assumes that I want to pass my students. There are some people that think the failure rate of college algebra should be 30 or 40%. I think that’s a bit rich for all my communications and political science majors – if they’ve put in a serious effort and got 60% on the exam/tests (no mean feat really – it’s kind of tricky) I’m happy to get them through.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.